Teri, on Feb 15 2010, 10:43 AM, said:
If you seek a certain level of recognition, another route will be needed.
What are we talking about? A career as a performing musician, or as a non-performing songwriter.
If it's a non-performing songwriter writing for famous artists, then I agree with Teri. Sooner or later your going to have to spend major time in a musical hub like Nashville, L.A. or New York.
But if you are a performing musician, I'm with Funk Daddy. You can carve out a niche anywhere and build on that. What's the difference between "independant" and "signed" anyway? All bands are "independant" when they start... and they usually start in their hometowns. I guess if you want to be a country artist you probably still have to go to Nashville, but other than that, what can be gained by moving to those hubs?
Also, Teri, I think your opinion is rather U.S.-centric. There
are other countries in the world and there are many fine artists who hit the big time without ever once stepping on U.S. soil, let alone moving to Nashville, New York, or L.A. Take Canada, for instance. Nickleback is from Hanna, Alberta and they are now based out of Vancouver. Hardly one of the world's big music hubs. Sure, they tour the U.S. but they didn't move there. Celine Dion, from a tiny town in Quebec - she didn't have to move to a major music centre to hit the big time. Shania Twain - different story. Because she is a country artist she had to move to Nashville to make it.
The point is, if you seek a certain level of recognition, it would probably be career suicide to move to Nashville, New York or LA. Mark's right. The music hubs are in decline and the internet is the new music hub. I actually believe it would be outright foolish for an aspiring musician to move to a music hub in order to get established. Why do that when they can gig in their own hometown, build a following and grow from there? You don't have to think twice about that.
Neal